.018
Well, it's better than the only other valid option - and i ain't going to shoot myself just because i was stupid fool enough to ever think their was an exception to the absolute cluelessness of ALL our Au public cannabis company "suits".
PS Waz - preventing fertilising males from running riot in the paddock is not a "bugbear" of this industry
- it is a cultivator's
derr #101 primary responsibility to ensure this does not EVER occur.
Who is responsible?
How much did it cost us in $$$?
(i know it cost Heyday, dearly, in repetitional damage amongst consumers. Us too, amongst our buyers?)
Are there any impairments resulting from this failure - and are they already accounted for?
And why did we only find out about this thru a 3rd party source?
Clueless.
Absolute novice beginners in EVERYthing cannabis related. Outsiders, carpet-baggers, arrogant fools, contemptuous of their customers
.....and treating the company owners - us - like mushrooms.
Yep, that is our Au cannabis leadership all right. ALL of them, it seems.
