In this particular set of notes, employee expense is pulled out and reconciles back to the line in the P&L. But I do take your point.
What I'm not following in your formula is why you would deduct flock amortisation from EBITDA. It shouldn't be in EBITDA in the first place, by nature. I also struggle to understand how a non cash depreciation expense would form part of cost of sales which is traditionally cash.
I can however imagine it is possible that chicken addition makes up a part of cost of goods sold on it its own, but I'm not sure that leaves enough of whatever else.
Probably could speculate all day but I think we need the contribution of someone more familiar with chicken farming.
Regardless of whether the farm breeds its own chooks, or its part of the COS expense - I think we can eliminate the risk of it being a hidden or lumpy capex expense that could give a big surprise down the line. We've already eliminated R&M too, so it really only leaves asset replacement / upgrades, so I don't think the risk of big lumps of 'maintenance/capex overly big
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- FRM
- Eggcellent
Eggcellent, page-105
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 25 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add FRM (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
11.5¢ |
Change
-0.010(8.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $26.09M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
12.0¢ | 12.0¢ | 11.5¢ | $1.752K | 14.70K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 7540 | 11.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
12.0¢ | 110761 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 10000 | 0.115 |
2 | 46500 | 0.110 |
1 | 500 | 0.105 |
1 | 25000 | 0.100 |
1 | 107312 | 0.093 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.120 | 110761 | 1 |
0.135 | 107680 | 2 |
0.145 | 16895 | 2 |
0.160 | 3375 | 1 |
0.170 | 13000 | 1 |
Last trade - 14.05pm 18/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
FRM (ASX) Chart |