This must have something to do with the litigation but it is odd to say the least. Spending approx $250K on an EGM wouldn't be a decision taken lightly I'd have thought. Perhaps as we have suspected, someone on the opposite side of the fence has been quietly accumulating shares and has now become a 'problem'?
KC
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AGS
- egm and clause 23
egm and clause 23, page-3
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 30 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)