EGM; No to 10, Inuit Uranium, and director shares?

Vote no to resolution 10: Inuit uranium project.



The project appears to be a payment for the overprized Finnish tenements
in a swap deal..
Just granted greenfield exploration right with substantial costs for holding.

The project appears to be a payment for the overprized Finnish tenements
If it would be a separate fair deal, then the shareholders can say no,
without causing another compensating deal for Fairhurst
Swap deal
https://hotcopper.com.au/threads/fairhurst-swap-fool%C2%B4s-gold-to-inuit-uranium.7979462/
History of uranium mining resistance on Canada
https://hotcopper.com.au/threads/inuit-uranium-likely-heavily-resisted-waste-of-resources.7988380/

Fairhurst
https://hotcopper.com.au/threads/fairhurst-midas-touch-with-golcap-and-newpeak.8001349/

It would be a total disaster and very expensive in far north.

Approving the shares for directors would cause huge dilution,
resolutions 8-9 and 11-13. Salaries and costs are extreme and results poor.
There appear to be emerging dept and loans not previously reported.
This would an investment of director lifestyle.


There will be huge dilution for the suspect operations. If you vote yes, you would get diluted for further decisions
https://hotcopper.com.au/threads/ceo-stuart-insider-loans-massive-dilution.7822353/

If it would be a separate fair deal, then the shareholders can say no,
without causing another compensating deal for Fairhurst

https://hotcopper.com.au/threads/fairhurst-swap-fool%C2%B4s-gold-to-inuit-uranium.7979462/

It would be a total disaster and very expensive in far north.

Director shares
Approving the shares for directors would cause huge dilution,
resolutions 8-9 and 11-13. Salaries and costs are extreme and results poor.
There appear to be emerging dept and loans not previously reported.

There will be huge dilution for the suspect operations.
If you vote yes, you would get diluted for further decisions