Ok, I’ll agree to take the moral high ground. But if money...

Ok, I’ll agree to take the moral high ground. But if money speaks to you and not morals, maybe you don’t see that they are actually taking from you! They are trying to dilute YOUR share of the company by buying part of your company at an overly-discounted price.

And if I may just correct you - we didn’t all have that opportunity - some lucky shareholders managed to buy a few before the price bounced up. Maybe at 10.5 your statement would have held true slightly more, but supply was not there for any increased demand you are suggesting. 11c would be closer to accurate, which would have been the sensible CR price. Funny that.

Second, it’s a weak argument to say you could have joined in and benefited from the mess that management caused by agreeing to sell off my property at a ridiculous price. They caused a drop in share price to 10c. So we don’t forget about that now and reward them for it.

VOTE NO.