IMO,previous CEO and the chairman should go,because they prepaid approximately US$18m (including cow insurance premiums) for suspicious R&D or did not prevent it to be prepaid.
Sadly 3 Australian directors (printed names at the last on the voting form?) resigned,they should remain on the board and try to protect Australian shareholders.
So IMO, against to elect,for for remove
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- EGM voting strategy?
IMO,previous CEO and the chairman should go,because they prepaid...
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)