MD/Wasa/everyone - I'm sure CC meant "illusion", not "allusion". And we've all had plenty of those (on the inflated side).
Wasa has made his decision and I know you were right in 2010, wasa, so that's a worry. The big decision ahead, as headbanger notes, is whether the risk is too big to take up the entitlement. And if not, we must accept being diluted. Wllm, I think it was you who said that the directors would be taking up their entitlement. Other than Abbotsleigh though I can't see any removal of the 50% condition for them in the latest supplementary. if they feel it's too risky then it must be. A loan converted to entitlements should have no risk. .. Think I will have to clarify that before we decide.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AGS
- EGM
EGM, page-108
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 5 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
KAI
Pilbara Minerals buys land off Kairos part of its York gold project for $20M – and a 2% royalty on any PLS gold sales
STX
Strike hands $48.5M contract to Clarke Energy to produce 20x 4.5MW gas engines for Sth Erregulla