Black Ops 8 I suggest you grow up mate and that you do it with facts that support that youre of investment age. To discuss your response I'm mainly confused about what part of my post you are actually adressing? Heres why.
Firstly I know that Datsur are reputed and large. Did I say that they werent? Imaginary arguement number one that you're having with me there.
I didn't say that Datsur have limited knowledge did I? That's another imaginary arguement your having with me when in fact I was contributing nothing of the like. I'm not sure what your playing at by pretednging with the forum that I'm arguing about those things. Read my posts and reply to things I've said if you dont mind. Things about carbon neutrality and pollution. Stay on point son, you're straying.
Secondly I am aware of Nlc and Nmdcs market relative capital and I'd like you, with your expertise, to tell me why those figures have anything to do with the companys expertise on carbon and pollution capture and storage. I'm interested in the policies that you'll bring to my attention because neither of those companys are in the business of capturing and storing pollution from their coal burning, nor are they concerned with Esis experience with carbon capture and storage. They only care about efficientcy and personally I doubt very strongly that they are concerned with anything other than a black coal equivalent and british thermal unit efficiencies when relating to Esi product and its effect on matmors production alike.
Thirdly the Australian government did not hand over $10million in R and D rebates for anything to do with carbon pollution offsets or carbon nuetral coal equivalents. That moiney was refunded (key word) for research done. It was not a gift or any form of endorsement.
Who do you think you are fooling by replying to me with bogus areguements that I didn't even enter into?
The fact remains that what I said is true. From the cradle to the grave, any coal mining, production and burning is yet to be proven worldwide to be 'carbon neutral' from the view of industrial processing which is why it is being sold to countries like India who are desperate to burn whatever they can in the name of electricity production. A company like Esi burns fossil fuels like any other in order to dig up coal, lignite or whatever product they mine (gas oil). Then they transport it (more fuel burned), produce their product (electricity used, more fossil fuels) and they eventually produce a final fuel based product which gets burned by a buyer.
And from there are you telling me that the companies being mentioned have refined all of those processes and the recipient has perfected a combustion processes to such a degree that they can claim to have achieved some extraordinary benchmark of industrial carbon neutrality or storge?
You don't need to be a scientist to know that the coldry product is planets away from being a carbon neutral process or anything close to it. Mate, it's basically black coal. When did black coal become non harmful to the environment? The story itself is a slap in the face for any company that's trying to improve on emissions, such as Esi. The story is an insult to any company who is trying to do good things. And to deny the reality that a coal product is pollutive by using arguements about how large a company is, how much market capital they own or how many tax rebates a company receives from their government for tax purposes actually irrelevant and it makes you sound naive.
With respect your reply was absolutely ignorant to the point being made about how polluting the product in question is and instead, you played the man, not the ball. I was knocking the Authors so called facts, not the company, not their affilates or their relative successes even though you're happy with pretending that I was.
Like I said and I will say it again, I will be very happy to argue this pollution and carbon neutrality point if you actually provide one in return, now that we have gotten your sidetracking racket out of the way.
Keep running rackets like this and you'll be picked up on it and corrected by the few of us who appreciate seeing real facts appear in this forum, instead of the alternative facts that circulate every price cycle or two. I'm not on the thumbs up team so I know you will only appreciate this reply by actually reading it and I respect you if you did.
PS I grew up a few decades before retirement and know a thing or two more than some of the hollow quick replys. And I am always redy to buy this or any company that kicks a goal. This one is yet to and is so far a long way from them and I wait with bated breath due to words like imminently, soon and progress.
Expand