BTA (ASX) email from cfo damian lismore

Originally posted by xFireStorMx ↑

http://www.news.com.au/perthnow/story/0,,25397672-5017962,00.html

Quoting Peter Cook on 28 April 2009:
"To assert, right now, that this (swine flu) will cause a massive rise in sales, well, that class of response is erroneous and lacks understanding."

Less than 1 week later, after the GSK reported doubling production was posted in HC and reported to BTA, on 4 May 2009 Peter Cook announced: Important GSK initiatives to new influenza A (H1N1) strain.

And on 22 Jul 09, GSK announced it will triple its production capacity.

Peter Cook has consistently showed a total lack of understanding of Relenza. In October 2007, despite Roche reporting a sharp drop in Tamiflu sales, Peter Cook informed shareholders the reasons why the factors causing the sharp drop in Tamiflu sales will not affect Relenza. Less than 24 hours after the idiot’s statement, GSK reported a similar sharp drop in Relenza sales.

BrentStory, you posted this

Quote He would have been involved in discussions with GSK to increase the production, he has clearly developed a positive working relationship with GSK in recent years. We have seen production triple under his reign.

Using the Brent Story’s logic, BTA’s law suit against GSK developed a far more positive working relationship with GSK than Peter Cook’s discussions as evidenced by the more than fifteen fold production increase during the Avian Flu outbreak compared to the triple increase.

Read the details at
http://www.hotcopper.com.au/post_single.asp?fid=1&tid=956278&msgid=5328218

Brent, here is another opportunity to response. As you asserted Peter Cook was in discussions with GSK to increase production, surely GSK would have told him of the plan to double production they (GSK) announced less than a week later, would they? Thus you Brent Story must be implying Peter Cook lied on 28 April stating those who believe swine flu will cause a massive rise in sales lacks understanding?

If you want readers to take your posts seriously, you should be able to back your facts up especially where it is shown that you distorted the facts to rubbish others and to champion your idiot CEO Peter Cook.