email from citation, page-51

Yes T4P you certainly did make a comment about that 2,500, but, I was surprised that you relied upon "I can't remember any period in which that happened" and "I suggest this statement is incorrect".

T4P it has nothing to do with "recollection" it is all about "research". Those 6 days that I mentioned are there for all to see if they were serious about "research" and the statement was blatantly wrong, again, for all to see (and pick up on").

T4P you make a great leader for this "cause", but, don't waste your skills on me, or on posting it all on H.C., do some REAL good by venting your dissatisfaction on those that can change the situation and you know very well who they are.
TUs and point scoring on H.C. will get us nowhere.

And as far as those numbers of mine are concerned, 2.5 million in 6 days after the company announcement pales into insignificance with the 80 million after the The Next Oil Rush story. So, when it comes to "influence" I am sure that the TNOR story would win hands down, so, let's not let them off the hook either.

Now, let's all get on with trying to extract some information for all shareholders' benefit.