Quite an interesting point and I may well seek further clarification.
From my point of view the material event is that the claim has been lodged, it matters little to FAR who they are actually up against, the defendant is just the means to FAR's end (from FAR's perspective).
I would not expect an announcement saying 'by the way that arbitration case is now involving Woodside' if nothing else regarding the case, such as the end goal, has changed. I cant see the point of such as announcement as what would it change from the markets perspective regarding FAR?
Email from FAR, page-18
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 42 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add FAR (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
49.5¢ |
Change
-0.003(0.50%) |
Mkt cap ! $45.74M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 50.0¢ | 50.3¢ | 49.5¢ | $74.71K | 149.9K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 37432 | 49.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 51.0¢ | 202895 | 4 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 06/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| FAR (ASX) Chart |