OBBear, will publish the response assuming no request from OBJ to the contrary.
Note that the actual points made in the email were just as relevant to a shareholders interests and their HC post here, and thus was the reason for the posting here on HC.
I tend to think that the original announcement WAS 'material' and 'price sensitive' (and still is) but to admit to that under yesterdays ASX request would force OBJ to have to break their disclosure to GSK - thus the best way out was to simply SAY that it is 'non material'. I was trying to bring that to HC readers attention. That's just an observation and opinion on my part. Could be wrong.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- WFL
- email query to obj, re ann's
email query to obj, re ann's, page-3
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 26 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add WFL (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
0.3¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.478M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
WFL (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non Executive Director
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online