“it doesn't surprise that there'd be a difference between the ABC and AFR reporting.”
Really?
When it comes to representating the official public articulations made by company directors, what basis would any media outlets have to those facts any other way, other than factually accurate?
The AFR reported ORIGIN and AGL executives as stating that those companies are walking back their renewable energy investments.
Those statements are on the public record and are backed by corporate strategies currently in train. So, accurate reporting by the AFR, which can be substantiated by the facts.
Not sure why any media outlet, which is objective and not ideological partisan, would not report the facts as they are.
