Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

well for a start one media unit has an editorial policy which...

First 8 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Scott th Ratbag

57,901 Posts.

664

17/06/24

16:05

Post #: 74354285
Share

Originally posted by madamswer: ↑

“it doesn't surprise that there'd be a difference between the ABC and AFR reporting.”

Really?

When it comes to representating the official public articulations made by company directors, what basis would any media outlets have to those facts any other way, other than factually accurate?

The AFR reported ORIGIN and AGL executives as stating that those companies are walking back their renewable energy investments.

Those statements are on the public record and are backed by corporate strategies currently in train. So, accurate reporting by the AFR, which can be substantiated by the facts.

Not sure why any media outlet, which is objective and not ideological partisan, would not report the facts as they are.

.

Expand

well for a start one media unit has an editorial policy which attempts to get all journos to be as neutral as possible./ the other tends to push an ideological angle.

can you guess which one is which?

surely you've been aware of this distinction.
10 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

GLF

Gemlife used the ASX's new IPO fast-track. Is this the start of a new cycle?

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 016 – FY25 ended up not so bad... but Trump unpause is coming

Trump chides Powell as Goldman call for calm. The RBA must be nervous

ASX Market Close: Local bourse dips red as CBA profit takers swoop

CCO

The Calmer Co FY25 revenue hits $8 million, up 86% on FY24

First 8 Last

SPONSORED BY