And you have come to this conclusion by analysing and comparing the Dante geochemistry and geophysics with that of Nebo-Babel, or it just, "looks to be"?
You are correct in stating that rock chips mean very little, yet GCX has an historic 310m drill interval.
Similarly, you are comparing the Cu/Au, PGE prospectivity of GCX in the West Musgrave with the Mn, Li, REE, Nb prospectivity, or lack thereof, of RR1 in other parts of Australia.
Do you consider these valid analogies? If so, why?
Enormous Upside Potential, page-43
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 29 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
