Not sure how you can call Coda ''Garbage''.
Historical assays are excellent.
You have determined that Coda is ''garbage'' purely based on a company's met results which is located 25- 30 km's from ENV, and even if ENV's met results are similar, you have no idea if ENV's deposit will eventually become economical.
You have also made many other negative assumptions about Pocos and EQN's tenements.
My question is:
Are you a qualified geologist?
Not sure how you can call Coda ''Garbage''.Historical assays are...
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.7¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $10.20M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.7¢ | 0.7¢ | 0.7¢ | $3.238K | 462.5K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 24 | 30089155 | 0.7¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.8¢ | 9772810 | 13 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 11.43am 19/06/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| ENV (ASX) Chart |