My issue is with experienced traders telling noobs to hold onto losers .... "you don't have a loss till you sell" ... those sort of statements are just plain lies but noobs get suckered in by that sort of thinking because they haven't seen enough of the market to know that many stocks never recover and many of the ones that do take years.
You might be playing with tiny position sizes so big losses don't matter, I don't know but many noobs will be punting large amounts of their accounts into these dog poop things, you wipe out 50% on a 20% position size that takes a bit of work to come back from. Do it on 4 or 5 in a row and you're in real trouble, worse when they continue and you end up down 90% ... as many will be learning the hard way from all the lithium shitco pumps from last year
You don't need to hold all the way back down to catch the big moves, I'm mostly longer term. My current biggest winner CU6 I've held for nearly 12 months, it's never given me a reason to sell it, currently up 650% or so. Holding once the stock starts throwing out big red flags like ENV did is just unnecessary, I was aiming much higher for ENV but it became plainly obvious it was being distributed in a way that said it ain't going higher and likely going much lower ... and here we are ... worst thing for the baggies now is everyone knows they're out of cash so they either have to raise now or any news pump will be sold into as everyone anticipates the raise
btw you clearly don't understand the maths of trading, it's very simple, make $2 on your winners and lose $1 on your losers and you only need 33% win rate to breakeven ... tweak it from there(i.e make $5 and lose $1 or 50% win rate) to work out how you make money. Look at people like Minervini who are short term traders who've made many 10s of millions but the maths is the same whether you're short or long term
ENV Price at posting:
0.7¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Not Held
(20min delay)