Taxpayers in both the State and Federal jurisdictions help fund the EDO and this matter has found that they acted in an inappropriate manner.
These governments should be considering very seriously whether funding should be withdrawn because the Barossa project (and Woodside's Scarborough project) is of significant value to Australia.
Below are but a few examples of the Court expressing concern. The attribution is at the bottom of the post.
Then the EDO employs "experts" who are fundamentally dishonest.
Munkara v Santos NA Barossa Pty Ltd (No 3) [2024] FCA 9 (fedcourt.gov.au)
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Environmental Defenders Office mendacious conduct in the Santos matter
Environmental Defenders Office mendacious conduct in the Santos matter
- There are more pages in this discussion • 7 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)