Environmental Defenders Office mendacious conduct in the Santos matter

  1. 16,936 Posts.
    Taxpayers in both the State and Federal jurisdictions help fund the EDO and this matter has found that they acted in an inappropriate manner.

    These governments should be considering very seriously whether funding should be withdrawn because the Barossa project (and Woodside's Scarborough project) is of significant value to Australia.

    Below are but a few examples of the Court expressing concern. The attribution is at the bottom of the post.

    https://hotcopper.com.au/data/attachments/5890/5890335-0c12dfdbd0bde4417f669f2a0e79232b.jpg
    https://hotcopper.com.au/data/attachments/5890/5890342-bc1d77953f65cde1389c824351af6890.jpg
    Then the EDO employs "experts" who are fundamentally dishonest.

    https://hotcopper.com.au/data/attachments/5890/5890348-d4b84f98d8b0bb14e79a1247cb59d440.jpg
    Munkara v Santos NA Barossa Pty Ltd (No 3) [2024] FCA 9 (fedcourt.gov.au)
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.