Seems to be a little contradictory, done serious harm but no damage to other landholders or ground water. Then what was damaged, our own land, if so how? This looks like a environmental beatup, which will burn both CSM and UCG as the general public do not understand the difference. This could result in less exploration or companies wanting to do business in QLG or develop CSM or UCG.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- environmental harm
Seems to be a little contradictory, done serious harm but no...
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 31 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
NEWS
Antler Copper Project hits major permitting milestone – air quality permit advances to final review
LU7
Discover the strong preliminary feasibility of the Bécancour Lithium Refinery, showcasing resilience in a low pricing environment and a strategic plan to capitalize on future price recoveries