Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

ghislane maxwell? les wexnor?

First 3 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
bruceyg

35,295 Posts.

3

18/01/20

16:07

Post #: 42451315
Share

Originally posted by Orson ↑

Spot on. For me the key sentence is:

"...Wild appealed that ruling, maintaining the old Non-Prosecution Agreement should be thrown out, clearing the way for potential charges against alleged Epstein accomplices, who had been protected by the secret deal."

So who were the slimy lawyers protecting? Could maybe looking at how they benefited later give a clue? One became Trump's Labor Secretary, two others have just joined Trump's legal team. Another, whose law firm helped with the deal, became Trump's Attorney General, and was so involved he had to recuse himself from an early Epstein investigation.

Each were given the protection of Trump White House jobs directly after court rulings that favoured victims, making those lawyers vulnerable to court proceedings forcing them to reveal Epstein's accomplices.

You don't have to be Einstein to work out the identity of one person who is terrified of being named.

Expand

ghislane maxwell?

les wexnor?
5 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

Building value through discovery in Mexico’s silver heartland

Trump chides Powell as Goldman call for calm. The RBA must be nervous

A junior miner unlocking high-grade potential in British Columbia

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 016 – FY25 ended up not so bad... but Trump unpause is coming

AII

Inside the depths of Panasqueira: A legacy carved in rock

First 3 Last

SPONSORED BY