I amcurious what people think about the debt v equity point covered in the latest Cruxinterview. In the previous interview Mark Gray was very confident about the imminent debt arrangement, but since then he opted instead for a 100% equity raise. Matthew Gordon probes this point repeatedly and Mark Gray responds simply that the full capex was available from institutions via equity - so he took it. You can see why Matthew Gordon is puzzled - surely debt funding beats further dilution. If the terms of the debt was so onerous that he chose not to take it why didn't he say this? Mark Gray frankly seemed uncomfortable on the point.
For therecord I still believe this is a great investment - but I do think this point needsa better answer.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AHQ
- Equity v debt
Equity v debt
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 28 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add AHQ (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
SBW
SHEKEL BRAINWEIGH LTD
Dani Nadri, Country Manager Australia
Dani Nadri
Country Manager Australia
SPONSORED BY The Market Online