if you have a look at the term sheet for the debt - which is filed with ASX announcements you will see it carried a coupon in excess of 16% with an upfront face value discount of 9% large draw down and repayment bonus and a royalty - talk about dilutory - that crux interview was a complete waste of time - what answer did he want? the debt terms were usurous and equity was a much cheaper and safer route to pursue . Mark is a businessman- he is not going to bite a hand that he might need a feed from in the future
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AHQ
- Equity v debt
Equity v debt, page-14
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 15 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add AHQ (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
FHE
FRONTIER ENERGY LIMITED
Adam Kiley, CEO
Adam Kiley
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online