esi being backed confidently by their csi, page-84

"...Being a new tech..."

Hasn't it been around for over 20 years? How is that new?

"...who's going to buy their product? i just dont get it... power stations dont pay carbon tax as it is, so why do they want to reduce emissions?..."

First the revalation that at best Coldry can only deliver a 5% - 15% reduction of carbon emissions when a small % of BCE pallets are mixed with lignite and now a claim that power stations don't pay carbon tax!!!

Considering that export of Coldry pellets is not a realistic option, I hope for holder's sakes that the above isn't true.