I think it was Pasboz who said it was misleading to point out that Coldry is 26 years old because the carbon tax has only just begun.
Other than reducing carbon emissions for the sake of avoiding this tax, why else would a company go to the trouble and expense of employing Coldry. Especially since it actually reduces emissions by such a small amount?
To dry the coal for the sake of shipping for export I can understand but this could be a sticking point?
esi being backed confidently by their csi, page-88
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 22 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add ECT (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.2¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $6.343M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | 5022176 | 0.2¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.3¢ | 15303561 | 23 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.12pm 08/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| ECT (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable