I would imagine that the YES consortium will want to undertake due diligence on all potential users to ensure that the user has a viable project. In the past there was a long list of potential users wanting to reserve a port allocation entirely as a marketing exercise. I would imagine that YES will want take or pay arrangements with potential users. In my opinion based upon previous disclosures Cazaly, Minres, GWR, and possibly MDX ( DSO) are all at a point where they have undertaken readability studies and have mining approvals in place. I am not sure if FAS has finished these yet.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- FAS
- esperance port decision
esperance port decision, page-5
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 4 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)