Hi Paulie
I have seen higher IGV's used for some of the bigger players. Also read FS's (I've got the original from BBY & others) notes just then, so makes sense if one were to use a higher IGV. That in itself would add a lot of value to the overall potential.
For the time being, I've been overly conservative with 0.20c-$1 IGV of the ore, & am happy with my calcs of 747.5-805MT (without Area A) or 850-991MT (with pre-drill estimates for Area A) for E47/882 only.
Add to that pre-drill fig's from E47/1560 of 121-164 MT, we have 971-1155 Billion Tons .
IMHO, once the estimate is public knowledge then we can use a higher multiple & ($2/4/5) for sure.
Quick question for u/others on this forum, where did u hear abt RIO mayb interested in the future, was it on the BRR/AFR or other sources in the media?
We know the rich neighbours & current interest around their blocks, so who knows, it could all come together later on.
cheers
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- estimates
Hi PaulieI have seen higher IGV's used for some of the bigger...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 38 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add RHK (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
80.0¢ |
Change
-0.020(2.44%) |
Mkt cap ! $158.8M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
82.0¢ | 82.0¢ | 79.5¢ | $982 | 1.232K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 31 | 80.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
88.5¢ | 7600 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 31 | 0.800 |
1 | 2531 | 0.790 |
1 | 16200 | 0.760 |
2 | 5573 | 0.740 |
1 | 1309 | 0.700 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.885 | 7600 | 1 |
0.890 | 2368 | 1 |
0.910 | 20000 | 1 |
0.980 | 10000 | 1 |
1.000 | 1812 | 2 |
Last trade - 15.01pm 11/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
RHK (ASX) Chart |