I agree. Flexibility in the National Interest is important. But first being a strong advocate and then lukewarm in the face of adversity demonstrates a lack of commitment and indecisiveness.
Rudd's government all over: Peter Garrett being a prime bloody classic example! What a frigging disappointment he turned out to be!
- Forums
- Political Debate
- ets scheme put on back burner
I agree. Flexibility in the National Interest is important. But...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 23 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)