EU, US Green New Deal, China Carbon Market effective 16 July, page-7

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiative_forcing
https://www.globalchange.gov/browse/indicators/annual-greenhouse-gas-index
https://gml.noaa.gov/aggi/aggi.html

However, on another note, instead of using the numbers above (in which I quoted the GWP Global Warming Potentials), NOAA and the EPA's warming influence based on Watts / m2 paints a different picture. Because CFCs, HFCs tend to disintegrate in the atmosphere due to sunlight + O3, luckily they naturally disappear.

			GWP20	GWP100	Weight
1	CO2	2.111	1	1	0.52775	67.18651
2	NO2, N2O	0.52	1	1	0.13	16.54997
3	CH4	0.206	1	1	0.0515	6.556334
4	HCFCs, SF6	0.305	1	1	0.07625	9.707193
5		3.142	4	4	0.7855	100

You can see above with the Watts/M2 warming potential:

1. 23.5% CO2 from Transportation
2. 20.8% CO2 from Electricity
3. 13.1% NO2 from Agriculture
4. 10.7% CO2 from Industry (cement, etc)
5. 8.9% HFCs, CFCs from aerosols.
6. 7.4% CO2 from residential, commercial use.

It's clear aerosols only cause 9% of climate change, due to O3 reactions. On the other hand, CO2 is a nasty little pest.

In conclusion for REOs:

1. EVs (NdFeB Perm magnets, La/Ce in batteries) will solve 23.5% of the climate change problem.
2. Wind Turbines (NdFeB Permanent magnets) + perm magnets in new Nuclear Power Station turbines will solve 20.8%.
3. New efficient aircons (NdFeB Perm mags) will solve 8.9%.

The other 13.1% from agriculture, 10.7% from cement / steel production can also be solved via more efficient processes.
We can try being more vegetarian, and consuming less meat, dairy etc since NO2 from fertilizers and manure management is a problem. Although this is up to the society to decide.