Lol, your posts are just lame, I read them and they don't even...

Lol, your posts are just lame, I read them and they don't even warrant an intellectually discerning response. I feel like I could have the same conversation with myself if I took either side of the argument and the on one side only made banal statements and tried to disguise them in contextually inappropriate language.

I'll make a comment just to humour you, not that I expect an answer differing in sentiment to the bs you've already spewed. You're telling me that you only track three stocks and it just so happens that EUC, a stock you don't own, happens to be the stock that you have done your research on and read through the literature? Then after dissatisfaction with the literature, you made it your mission to continue posting on that forum and adopting the position of a 'contrarian' for that stock and that stock only, because the forum posters don't want you there and you want to 'keep the bastards honest'.

When your motivation for doing something can be reduced to a throwaway comment like that, you clearly have no discernable purpose for being here. Further to this your rationale for continuing to post the same bs over and over, is illogical. Thus your research, whilst it may be presented in a logical fashion is the result of an illogical mind, it should therefore also be treated sceptically.

If you are time poor, and you're an investor, why don't you spend the little time you have on your own stocks?

Nothing about what you say or post warrants has much validity any longer. So irrespective of how long you stick around to be a contrarian, no one cares and I certainly don't, so enjoy.

I dub thee Vintage The Contrarian Jester - he's always up to the same old tricks and they're just as laughable every time.