jakita – your post is a useless ramble and merely reflects your inability to understand the most basic of concepts.
You also have no self-awareness or sense of irony.
You make a very insulting post – casting aspersions on my simple intentions of sharing relevant information or relevant at least for those with the eyes to see – and then have the audacity to call me arrogant for merely calling you out on it!
They were YOUR insulting words and they deserved the retort of pointing out that they could only be made by a person with ‘a limited world view’.
YOU were the one that sought to discredit my posting with a volley of sarcasms and put-downs, as follows:
- Being ‘amused’ at the amount of time I spent posting
- Implying I am being deceptive (“or does he”?)
- Implying I was wasting my time (“I could think of a million things I would rather be doing”)
- Suggesting my behaviour was ‘weird’
- Implying again that I am being deceptive (“I still am suspicious of his motivations”)
- Accusing me of schadenfreude (“Seems to take too much pleasure in a declining SP for my liking”)
Following this volley of gratuitous insults, I merely pointed out that you (and jeretel) had a very limited world view, because you can’t get your mind around the concept of disinterested (in the correct sense of the word) sharing and goodwill.
You, instead, by YOUR words, see everyone’s actions (mine in this case) as always conditioned by vested and personal self-interest. That is WHY I wrote that you had a ‘limited world view’.
And, btw, having kids, travelling overseas and being a project manager has not one jot of relevance either to whether or not your world view is limited or otherwise, or to the discussions here.
It is what you believe and what you say (i.e. write) that is important here – not what you do or have done!
Additionally, in writing that “one thing is for sure and that is this Sentry Vs Vintage battle over the historical records means Jack Sh#t and only thing that will matter at the end of the day is EUC's drilling campaign” reveals that you have absolutely no understanding of the central issue at hand.
In terms of outcomes for EUC, your statement is true. NO discussions here will impact that!
But that is NOT the point. The point is that the discussions here have a very BIG impact on the entry and exit strategies of individual investors and speculators. Posters and readers will either reject the information (like sentry and most here) and buy and/or hold accordingly (or sell for some other reason) and others will take it on board and hold/buy regardless (due to acceptance of the implied risks) or sell now or sometime in the future (at an appropriate opportunity) as they no longer wish to stay long.
Some have clearly found it useful. Others have not. That is the nature of the beast.
If some believe that I have repeated the information too much, it is simply the mirror image of their repeated attempts to discredit and bury both the information and its provider.
(20min delay)
