Your comment shows you have absolutely no idea or understanding of the meaning of the findings. You have absolutely no idea what the findings are indicating. yet you choose to portray a pseudo scientific facade of regurgitating an irrelevant meaningless phrase . Are you aware of what growth rings in trees indicate? Do you know the relationship between tree rings, environment, growth and even CO2 if you had any form of scientific knowledge on the subject you would realise that your statement highlighted the fact that you definitely have no understanding on the topic or are just political motivated to pedal pseudo regurgitated commercial media illiterate phrases in hope that if you say it enough times it will be believed by the sheep of this world
