..PLS 'untimely' release of reality check results this morning...

  1. 26,737 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 2385
    ..PLS 'untimely' release of reality check results this morning probably put paid to an expected rebound amongst lithium hodlers.

    Let's break down PLS results

    Full Year FY24
    Revenues $1,254m
    EBITDA $538m
    NPAT $257m

    1st Half FY24
    Revenues $757m
    EBITDA $415m
    NPAT $220m

    therefore
    2nd Half FY24
    Revenues $497m
    EBITDA $123m
    NPAT $37m

    ...prices of SC (Spod) that PLS received on average across H2 FY24 is certainly above the current $775/T price as SC is now trading at the lows, so it could probably mean that PLS is on the brink of operating close to a loss if not a loss.

    Bell Potter had PLS 2025 NPAT at $193m based on SC at $1200, which I think is a big ask now. Even at this level, PLS would be trading at about 46x PE.

    If we annualised PLS 2H NPAT to $74m (i.e 2x$37m), at a market cap near $9B, that is a PE of 120x!!

    ...as I had cautioned months ago, ASX lithium majors have ways to go on the downside to be appropriately valued to earnings multiple aligned to US peers (which are single digits for some).

    ...a $2.895B valuation based on Bell Potters $193m NPAT x PE of 15x would give an indicative price target of $0.96 (a hefty -67% downside) BUT based on my X-mas theory, it is likely to retrace to $2.10, then we see where it goes.

    ...if PLS faces this daunting prospect, which led it to secure a debt facility to tie it through winter, the reckoning is ahead for LTR which is unlikely to be able to produce at a profit or only at marginal profits.
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.