How about you provide substantiation that AUZ has a financing package in place that only requires a decision by the AUZ board?
While you're at it substantiate your claim that the AUZ 'walked away' from SKI because the ASX announcement on this very issue says otherwise.
Finally, substantiate your claim that the Indo/PNG sulphate crystal facilties are in fact not economic and are 'too hard'.
I need factual evidence rusty, not your opinion because history suggests your opinion is not correct.
Thanks in advance.
How about you provide substantiation that AUZ has a financing...
Add AUZ (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $13.98M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 1.1¢ | 1.1¢ | 1.0¢ | $59.24K | 5.875M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 437625 | 1.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.1¢ | 7999864 | 25 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 15.46pm 11/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| AUZ (ASX) Chart |