So still no details about nuclear then ? No costing, no build time, no locations.
My, you are the expert at dodging answers after you've made a giant bs baseless statement.
Btw. How much money do you think governments spent around the world on developing nuclear energy ? And yet it still isn't the number one energy source. I wonder why ?
Renewables, on the other hand, are getting more efficient and cheaper by the day. All the technology around renewables e.g. storage , electric transport etc, is getting better and cheaper every day. We have only been pursuing renewables seriously for a decade or so and already they are working well. Imagine in another couple of decades how good it will be ?
How long have we been developing nuclear power ? The French have been at it since the 1940's and yet they still don't completely rely on it. They are now investing in renewables themselves.
Nuclear has missed it's window. It's over. And you can't even present a case for it. All you've got is a bunch of hot air.
