Bjorn Lomborg is at best a controversial figure. Following are...

Bjorn Lomborg is at best a controversial figure. Following are two comments made about him in his Wikipedia entry

The Climate Feedback reviewers assessed that the scientific credibility ranged between "low" and "very low"

DCSD released a ruling that sent a mixed message, finding the book to be scientifically dishonest through misrepresentation of scientific facts, but Lomborg himself not guilty due to his lack of expertise in the fields in question

Relying on Lomborg support for mild hybrids would not seem to be useful.

I have no doubt that mild hybrids will prove popular for a short period notwithstanding a pretty pathetic 5-15% improvement in fuel economy - but of course that is not the argument. Whilst Bjorn doesn't believe that any action should be taken with regards to climate change, the reality is that governments around the world have already announced the end of fossil fuel based vehicles.

When one side of an argument resorts to advice from Bjorn Lomborg it surely must be time leave this issue to be settled by historians?