evolution is for monkeys, page-245

Dates like 25000 & 40000 years quite often get bandied about like glitter on a pre-schoolers art work. The out come of it all is, it means absolutely nothing.


You can read more concerning evolution fakes, hoaxes & outright lies in the links below.



Remember Reiner Protsch, that's the one from above that has had to resign in disgrace after a Frankfurt University panel ruled he had “fabricated data and plagiarized the work of his colleagues”. Believe it or not he's the same professor & I use the term professor very lightly that dated the Neanderthal skull to 36000 years ago. He also dated Binshof - speyer woman to 21.300 years. A new date from Oxford places her at 1.300 BC. He also dated Paderborn - sande man at 27.400 years the corrected figure reaveals he died a few hundred years ago in 1750 AD. It was Protsch's work that seemed to prove that Neanderthal man and modern humans had not only co existed but had also mated together. This is now known to be absolute rubbish.


"Bizarre revelations about the career of a 65-year-old anthropologist who was recently forced to retire from the University of Frankfurt have set tongues wagging in international scientific circles.

Reiner Protsch von Zieten, a larger-than-life professor with a penchant for luxury cars and Cuban cigars, was forced to end his 30-year career as a carbon-dating specialist following a year-long investigation into his professional "indiscretions." Many of Protsch's colleagues had their suspicions about his work, and in 2001 Thomas Terberger of Greifswald University sent several fossil samples originally dated by Protsch to Oxford University's Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit for reanalysis. Hahnhöfersand Man, the "world's oldest German" at 36,300 years old, proved to be only 7,500 years old. Binshof-Speyer Woman, a 21,300-year-old specimen known for her remarkably well-preserved teeth, was just 3,090 years old. And Paderborn-Sande Man, dated by Protsch to 27,400 years ago, had died in the eighteenth century. Terberger published a paper on his findings with Martin Street of the Römisch-Germanisches Zentralmuseum, and the University of Frankfurt later launched an investigation. Protsch dismissed the new dates, blaming the results on the possibility that lab workers did not remove shellac from the samples before performing carbon-14 testing."





http://hotcopper.com.au/post_threadview.asp?fid=300&tid=2245588&msgno=18613#18613

http://archive.archaeology.org/0505/newsbriefs/insider.html