This just (yet) another version of the (very) old "irreducible complexity" argument that was first used in response to Darwin more than 150 years ago, citing the human hand or eye as examples of complex features that "could not possible have evolved" from simpler antecedents. The argument has been comprehensively demolished many, many times and finding new "examples" doesn't make it any less wrong. I suggest you google the "Blind Watchmaker" argument or perhaps read this slightly more complex rebuttal.
