CFU ceramic fuel cells limited

The German govt is quite comfortable to invest/subsidise/support...

  1. 1,546 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 5
    The German govt is quite comfortable to invest/subsidise/support fuel cell technology but instead we go for a tax on the "big polluters".

    The Germans have an emissions trading scheme too.

    A carbon tax or trading scheme is better than subsidies, as it avoids having government try to guess which technologies are best and what level they should be subsidised at. That's led to over-investment in solar in Germany and in residential solar in NSW, and other malinvestment elsewhere.

    If high-emission power generation is taxed appropriately, then the high efficiency and low emissions of CFCL's fuel cells becomes more significant.

    Similarly, I'd prefer to see a single universal (1 for 1?) feed-in-tariff, not ad hoc tariffs for different kinds of generation. That plus a universal carbon tax without exemptions (or free handouts) and CFCL would really be looking good.

 
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.

Currently unlisted public company.

arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.