There are a few scenarios offered as an alternative to the obvious. Its been discussed in much greater details in the other chat site. Simply put, Rio is a miner not an engineering/mining operator so they are more than likely to retain a substantial holdings. CGNPC/Itochu are consumers with no U mining expertise so wants a guaranteed security of supply. A probable scenario in a win-win status quo for a 3 way ownership IMO. The question is will the remaining unencumbered 32% of holders remain a stakeholders?
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.8¢ |
Change
-0.001(11.1%) |
Mkt cap ! $18.65M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.9¢ | 0.9¢ | 0.8¢ | $3.936K | 439.2K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | 4454579 | 0.8¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.9¢ | 3195182 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 10.58am 18/06/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| EXT (ASX) Chart |