Hi Emerald,
"My feeling is that they are all associated... "
My opinion is that they ARE associated in the commonly undersood sense but not in the legal one. If they were legally associated, then I don't see how Polo could have acquired their holding without falling foul of takeover rules... and I don't think RIO would have been backward in coming forward if there was a case to answer.
As you say, I have no doubt that Dattels will have taken careful legal advice over this and will have structured his transactions in a manner that he felt was legally bomb-proof.
Regards,
Mark
Hi Emerald,"My feeling is that they are all associated... "My...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add EXT (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.2¢ |
Change
0.001(9.09%) |
Mkt cap ! $16.22M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 1.1¢ | 1.2¢ | 1.1¢ | $43.95K | 3.752M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 2565000 | 1.1¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.2¢ | 6944411 | 8 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 15/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| EXT (ASX) Chart |