Anyone care to comment on the inferences that can be drawn about field size based on the results of an extended flow test?
For example, if we see a 5% fall off in pressure over a month at a flow rate of 40mmscf, we can probably expect the field size to be very small? In the above example probably less that 0.5bcf?
There must be a formula to work out field size based on flow rate and pressure decline over time?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- KEY
- extended flow test
extended flow test
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 4 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add KEY (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
0.1¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $2.262M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
KEY (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable