Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Yes they should have dragged him down.I support the principle of...

First 5 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
bingbing

918 Posts.

49

18/10/19

18:45

Post #: 40960382
Share

Originally posted by jeremycbrowne: ↑

You agree with the approach of ER, blocking traffic and halting trains? Presumably you’d also know how to deal with an angry public? Getting attention is easy. Anyone can do that. If I stripped naked and screamed loudly in the CBD I can pretty much guarantee I’ll get media coverage.

So what happens when someone dies because of these protests? Maybe someone can’t get to a hospital in time. Maybe a donor heart is held up in traffic. What then? The end justifies the means right?

Hydrocarbon companies could not have done better than ER to discredit ‘climate change’ hysteria. When you’re forced to harm people to get your message across, what does that say about the quality of your arguments?
Do you think it was right to drag that train climber down? Yes or no?

Expand

Yes they should have dragged him down.

I support the principle of non violent distribution.
On top of an electric train is a bit daft.

Last edited by bingbing: 18/10/19
3 Upvote

Reply

First 5 Last