I would like to add that I don't understand how the University...

I would like to add that I don't understand how the University of Missouri test results are independent when the technology was developed at the University of Missouri.

The other results are from a Chinese firm (name not mentioned of course) whose results are vastly different than University of Missouri. Chinese data can often be skewed for self interest, hard to say.

Seems to me that it is mainly an app which has not gained much traction. Hard to believe WBT bothered with them. Just focus on what you have, Shanny

If anyone is interested the law suit is in regards that the plaintiff alleges that EyeVerify is misleading consumers and in reality scan the periocular area (area around the eye) and not the veins in the eye white. Of course, both sides have their views

http://www.planetbiometrics.com/art...laint-filed-against-eye-vein-biometrics-firm/

Again, no idea why NXR/WBT bothered