Nonsense Moseley you havent understood my post at all.
It seems to me that Heathgate are SAYING OR CONCEDING THEY DIDNT KEEP AGS INFORMED OF PROSPECTIVITY LEADING UP TO THE EXTENTION. They dont think it is relevant because:
!. THEY DONT HAVE A DUTY TO INFORM AGS UNDER THE JV THEY HAD.
2. HAD AGS KNOWN HOW PROSPECTIVE THE AREA WAS THEY WOULD STILL HAVE RENEWED THE JV.
You got 7 thumbs up for a reply demonstrating complete miscomprehension, and I am no wiser. I am selling.
facing the music, page-11
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 32 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)