Hi Sledger,
One cannot question the accuracy of such articles giver their track record. Case in point,
The 2016 election is already decided. History says Hillary Clinton wins.
Spoiler alert: Hillary Clinton wins.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...06711fd2125_story.html?utm_term=.f9618bca61bb
&
Trump has about a 30 percent chance of winning the presidency; how does that make you feel about executive power?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...about-executive-power/?utm_term=.257e18c5c271
This is a good one,
Donald Trump’s chances of winning are approaching zero
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-are-approaching-zero/?utm_term=.f917eee5006e
The list goes on, it is not that people do not read MSM but rather they read it and what has actually occurred, is it a good source or rather a narrative pre-set to program the masses to some extent. I will let you do some research into that one, as at the moment are you so sure about the article you present, is a good source or a narrative pre-set to do what is the question.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Fact checking Trump's speech
Fact checking Trump's speech, page-2
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 23 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
SBW
SHEKEL BRAINWEIGH LTD
Dani Nadri, Country Manager Australia
Dani Nadri
Country Manager Australia
SPONSORED BY The Market Online