Fact checking Trump's speech, page-2

Hi Sledger,

One cannot question the accuracy of such articles giver their track record. Case in point,

The 2016 election is already decided. History says Hillary Clinton wins.
Spoiler alert: Hillary Clinton wins.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...06711fd2125_story.html?utm_term=.f9618bca61bb

&

Trump has about a 30 percent chance of winning the presidency; how does that make you feel about executive power?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...about-executive-power/?utm_term=.257e18c5c271

This is a good one,

Donald Trump’s chances of winning are approaching zero

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-are-approaching-zero/?utm_term=.f917eee5006e

The list goes on, it is not that people do not read MSM but rather they read it and what has actually occurred, is it a good source or rather a narrative pre-set to program the masses to some extent. I will let you do some research into that one, as at the moment are you so sure about the article you present, is a good source or a narrative pre-set to do what is the question.