Slick,
of course you have no association with WU, BLR or AT. The reason is you were either an industry acquantence or previously worked with one of those 3 entities. But it is clear you have an issue with Glaiser or Siglin and are very close to the story.
We all notice you don't admit to knowing Glasier or Siglin. So you play the word game here. But you are MUCH closer to the story than you are telling anyone here.
Which is fine. Because Glasier does not need to ever provide a pea, pfs or anything else you are requesting. He can go into production and will go into production without these. He has proven you and every other merchant of doom wrong. And i don't need to persuade you or anyone else on the economics of Sunday Complex or WU. I am not here to entertain you, i am here to make money.
Do you own WU shares today? Do you know Glasier? Do you know Siglin?
Cait
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- BLR
- Facts are facts
Facts are facts, page-24
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 19 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)