The major problem with the theory of AGW is that they cherry pick data to suit their funding/career/agenda. If anyone can answer these questions I might be able to accept the theory.
Why did temperatures in the 20th century rise before carbon dioxide levels rose?
Why did we have an ice age when carbon dioxide levels were 10 times higher than today?
Why did we have the Great Global Warming period following the last ice age?
Believers do not even attempt to answer these questions which indicates a political agenda not a scientific one.
To think that we humans have more effect on global temperatures than the sun over epochs is utter hubris and ignorance of solar cycles at various degrees.
We should be all very concerned by consensus science which only measures popularity, not critical thinking. Because when everyone is thinking the same, no one is thinking.
The great irony is that while everyone is extrapolating prior warming trends, and preparing accordingly, they should actually be preparing for a solar minimum cooling.
- Forums
- Science & Medicine
- Facts Don't Lie:
Facts Don't Lie:, page-197
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
BTH
BIGTINCAN HOLDINGS LIMITED
David Keane, Co-Founder & CEO
David Keane
Co-Founder & CEO
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online