The issue I have with classifying LBT corp as an insto is in the transformation exercise there was no details on what $$$ they had actually provided to AK for a share of his business. Most people presumed he owned close to 100% when in fact it turned out LBT owned majority of his business.
I always stated without knowing what they lent it's near impossible to understand at what point they have to exit to break even. Their holding didn't seem to be remotely institutional though more like a friend/investor who'd partnered with AK to establish the business.
Pretty sure Bas or someone else ran an equifax/ASIC check on the company and it only had 1-2 directors linked. They also don't seem to have affiliations in terms of investing in many other ASX listed stocks which more suggests just an investment vehicle of a rich individual(s) than an institutional investor.
The thing that I find interesting is we have no business updates yet it appears that potentially AK and the largest shareholders have exited the building based on the dump yesterday afternoon. If that is the case why?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Fairfax article
The issue I have with classifying LBT corp as an insto is in the...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 74 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add CGB (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
EQN
EQUINOX RESOURCES LIMITED.
Zac Komur, MD & CEO
Zac Komur
MD & CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online