You talk a lot and really say nothing at all.At first glance it...

First 297 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Azzler

347 Posts.

203

20/04/24

14:53

Post #: 73438347
Share

Originally posted by morningsuits5: ↑

It is not that complicated. If an answer proffered does does not logically align with the question, very likely something is wrong. Or in this case, someone is lying.

Some AVZ shareholders are ok with Nigel remaining at the helm, even if it prevents AVZ from obtaining a deal which would grant AVZ shareholders ownership of the southern portion. Despite Nigel arrogantly shutting all doors, they will tell themself that all is ok, since AVZ can seek recourse via ICSID, but this is misguided for two reasons.

The first reason is that AVZ's ICSID claim will be defeated at ICSID, well that is almost certainly the view held by litigation funders. If AVZ had a strong claim, and were likely to be awarded significant damages, litigation funders would be aggressively competing with each other to get a slice of the action by funding AVZ's claim. The major litigation funders like Burford, Therium, Harbor, Parabellum and Fortress would be banging on AVZ's door.

There are not many meritorious billion dollar ICSID claims floating around, and all of the major funders are well capitalized and under constant pressure to find new investments. So why is AVZ dealing with Locke Capital, an unknown funder in the international arbitration space?

The second reason is that AVZ will not secure funding to pursue the ICSID claim. This is largely due to the many challenges AVZ will face on the merits of it's claim. It is also due to the low amount of damages AVZ would receive if it were successful. In the history of ICSID, I cannot find one example of a mining company, that only holds an exploration license, being awarded damages on a DCF basis.

AVZ Shareholders who claim AVZ will be awarded billions at ICSID are either deliberately deceiving other AVZ shareholders with this baseless claim, or suffer from delusional tendencies.

For the "thinking people" who are AVZ shareholders, who actively question everything and seek the truth, analyze the Credibility International report " Study of Damages in Investor-State Cases" on the link above. The study is based on 241 final public arbitral awards issued from the inception of such disputes in 1981 through March 31, 2020.

Expand

You talk a lot and really say nothing at all.
At first glance it gives the impression that you might be sophisticated, with dot points and everything!
But much like someone else we all know, you don't have anything, you don't say anything, it's all just implied, suggested, and sometimes straight up lies, speaking as if you know things that you really have no clue about.

Everyone sees through you.

I think you and Geist have teamed up here, this is his style, but he's incomprehensible.
He gives you the first draft of what to post, then you are the ghost writer? Is that how it works?
Geist used to use this account, but now apparently it's Ty Dudbrooke.
The other day you refered to yourself as "we" when talking to N.Diamond.
Who's we huh?

AVZ Price at posting: 78.0¢ Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Held
12 Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply