Families of US soldiers suing em1's customer "mtn" for allegedly funding al-Qaeda, Taliban

if em1's crowd1 ponzi scheme fiasco wasn't enough, now a major lawsuit against em1's customer mtn is proceeding. could halt the relationship due to Australia's "Know Your Customer (KYC)" laws?
(em1 operates the "mtn arena" platform)

"MTN is being sued by families of US soldiers for allegedly aiding militant groups al-Qaeda and Taliban in Afghanistan... Allegations made are that MTN paid more than $100 million to the militant groups so its cellular towers would not be targeted."

"Families of hundreds of US soldiers who are suing MTN for allegedly aiding militant groups in Afghanistan have filed papers challenging the firm's argument that the case should not be heard in the US.

The original suit, filed in December 2019 in the US District Court in the District of Columbia, alleges that MTN violated the US Anti-Terrorism Act by paying protection money to al-Qaeda and the Taliban.

MTN said it would "defend its position accordingly".

In new court papers, filed on Tuesday by Washington-based law firms, the families argue that MTN must be held accountable in a US court for the alleged offence.

Rule

"The court should recognise and reject MTN's argument for what it is: an attempt to enshrine a rule that a foreign company can obtain US financing, use the financing to support terrorist attacks on Americans, and face no accountability for doing so," the papers read.

The case centres around allegations that MTN paid more than $100 million to al-Qaeda and the Taliban so its cellular towers would not be targeted for destruction. MTN deactivated those towers at night, preventing US intelligence operations, according to the suit.

In September, MTN lodged a motion to dismiss the suit, arguing the United States was not the proper jurisdiction for the case, and that it did not knowingly support the groups.

MTN head of corporate affairs Nompilo Morafo said on Wednesday it would "defend its position accordingly", adding that the suit was not "viable".

"MTN requested that the court end the lawsuit and grant a judgment in MTN's favour for two independent reasons: because the court lacks jurisdiction over MTN, which does not operate in the US, and because the complaint does not allege any conduct by MTN that violated the Anti-Terrorism Act," added Morafo.

MTN said it would now be allowed to file a written reply in support of its motion by 5 February."

https://www.news24.com/amp/news24/southafrica/news/families-of-us-soldiers-suing-mtn-for-allegedly-funding-al-qaeda-taliban-20201209

see additional "controversies" section on wiki involving mtn & billions in fines:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/MTN_Group

does em1 have a moral compass?